Handwriting Dispute, Transparency Debate: Trump vs. Democrats on Epstein Docs



What changed with Trump: After the House Oversight Committee posted the full 2003 “Epstein birthday book,” which includes a crude note and drawing attributed to Donald Trump, he publicly denied it was his handwriting or “language,” calling the matter “dead” and a hoax. Coverage shows he’d previously signaled openness to releasing Epstein records, but has since shifted tone as the book became public and Democrats amplified it.

What the birthday book is: A 238-page scrapbook compiled for Epstein’s 50th, now posted by House Oversight. Major outlets have summarized who’s in it (e.g., Trump, Bill Clinton, Leon Black) and the often bawdy messages. You can read news rundowns and commentary from The New Yorker, PBS, The Guardian, and a background explainer (updated) on Wikipedia.

Democrats’ push for files: House Democrats have been pressing for broader releases of Epstein-related records beyond what DOJ has already provided; Oversight recently posted more than 33,000 pages. In the Senate, Democrats moved to force a public release via the defense bill but Senate Republicans blocked it 51–49 (Hawley and Paul siding with Democrats). A House discharge effort to force a floor vote is reportedly one signature away.

Other fresh angles: U.K. reporting tied the book to Epstein’s early entrée into British high society via the Leese family (and, indirectly, Bullingdon Club circles). U.S. commentary spans from straight reporting to sharp opinion pieces reacting to the document’s tone and implications. 



Links

















Please Like & Share 😉🪽
@1TheBrutalTruth1 Sept 2025 Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Charlie Talks About Epstein

Image
Between 28:52 and 30:00 of the video, Charlie Kirk frames Jeffrey Epstein not just as an isolated predator but as a tool of influence and compromise. The lies about Charlie. Charlie in his own words. Questions about the investigation. They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk. | Candace Ep 235 - YouTube Between 28:52 and 30:00 of the video, Charlie Kirk frames Jeffrey Epstein not just as an isolated predator but as a tool of influence and compromise. He suggests Epstein’s network functioned as a “lever” for powerful elites—politicians, financiers, even intelligence services—to entrap and control people. He stresses that the scandal wasn’t only about private depravity but about systematic blackmail designed to ensure loyalty and silence. Kirk points to the strange protection Epstein enjoyed for years, implying he was too useful to certain powerful interests to be stopped until he became a liability. What ties these threads together is the idea of influence bought or weaponized: Charlie Kirk’s c...
Read more

Supreme Court Issues 9-0 Unanimous Decision Changing Second Amendment & 4th Amendment

Image
  Barnes v. Felix case, why the Court struck down the “moment of threat” rule, and how this changes self-defense cases, concealed carry laws, and police encounters forever. Supreme Court Issues 9-0 Unanimous Decision Changing  Second Amendment & 4th Amendment Fight! There were two separate 9–0 rulings in 2025 : Fourth Amendment — Barnes v. Felix (May 15, 2025): The Court unanimously rejected the “moment-of-the-threat” test in police-force cases and said courts must assess the totality of circumstances (including officers’ conduct leading up to a shooting) when judging reasonableness. That refines Fourth-Amendment excessive-force doctrine ; it doesn’t rewrite the Amendment’s text.  Example: Officers chase a teen for a busted taillight into a dim alley. Without waiting for backup or announcing themselves, they rush in with guns drawn, corner him, and shout conflicting commands. The teen, panicking, reaches toward his waistband to pull out a phone; an officer fires...
Read more

Why Charlie Kirk Looked That Way in His Casket (Embalmer Reacts)

Image
People are asking why Charlie Kirk looked the way he did in his open casket — from the yellow hands, to the “waxy” appearance, to conspiracy theories that it wasn’t even him. As a licensed funeral director and embalmer, I’m breaking down what you’re really seeing. Why Charlie Kirk Looked That Way in His Casket (Embalmer Reacts) This is just a general look at how embalming can affect appearance. Every case is unique, and my goal is simply to share understanding, not to speak about any one person. Yellow discoloration of hands or skin can come from a few common causes: jaundice (liver failure or medications), postmortem chemical shifts, or the interaction of embalming fluids with blood pigments. Some are pointing to the yellowing of Charlie Kirk’s hands in the casket as proof of something sinister, but what isn’t being said is that discoloration like this often signals more than just “jaundice.” In cases of sudden or violent death, the body’s chemistry can shift unpredictably, creating p...
Read more