Why did Senator Lisa Murkowski flip her vote to block the Epstein files, and what do her ties to Ghislaine Maxwell reveal about elite cover-ups?

 What’s emerging around Murkowski’s vote isn’t just hypocrisy—it’s the outline of a pattern Americans were never meant to notice. 

From rubbing elbows at the 2013 Arctic Circle Forum to Borgerson moderating a 2016 Council on Foreign Relations event with Murkowski, these links cast a shadow over her recent vote to kill the Epstein Files Transparency Act—despite her earlier public support for their release. Chartouni, an Alaskan native, calls out the betrayal, especially after Rep. Harriet Hageman’s broken promises, demanding accountability with fiery resolve: "She needs to be shamed!"

When a senator publicly supports releasing the Epstein files, then suddenly flips to kill the bill after revelations surface about her overlapping circles with Ghislaine Maxwell, Scott Borgerson, and Alaska’s powerful donor network, people naturally suspect the vote wasn’t about “procedure” or “timing,” but about self-preservation. These weren’t distant, accidental passings at conferences; they were recurring appearances inside the same elite ecosystems—Arctic policy panels, CFR discussions, donor circuits, and private industry circles tied to major Alaska infrastructure and shipping interests. Survivors are now calling out what looks like a political forcefield forming around anyone who brushed too close to Epstein’s orbit, and Murkowski’s reversal fits the template: support transparency until transparency threatens the wrong people. The DOJ’s silence, the sealed records, the donor money, the Arctic development interests—all of it feeds the suspicion that the Epstein network wasn’t just about trafficking but about influence, leverage, and access. And when the first cracks appear—like this vote—they don’t look random. They look coordinated.



Please Like & Share 😉🪽

@1TheBrutalTruth1 Nov. 2025 Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Political and Legal Escalation Around the Clintons and Epstein

Image
  What’s real right now is a political and legal escalation around the Clintons and Epstein , but the “referred to DOJ for arrest” line you’re seeing is mostly a spin on a narrower, procedural step. Here’s how it breaks down in plain terms: The House Oversight Committee , chaired by Rep. James Comer , has issued subpoenas for Bill and Hillary Clinton to sit for depositions about Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, along with subpoenas to the Department of Justice for Epstein-related records.  These subpoenas are part of a broader Epstein investigation on Capitol Hill, not a criminal indictment. Congress is demanding testimony and documents; DOJ is being compelled to turn over files.  The Clintons have so far refused to appear for the requested depositions, which has triggered talk among some Republicans about treating them like Steve Bannon was treated (i.e., contempt of Congress referrals to DOJ if they keep defying subpoenas).  This is where th...
Read more

Donald Trump has not been criminally implicated or charged in Epstein’s sex-trafficking crimes based on the evidence released so far.

Image
 He is heavily associated with Epstein in the records  and emails, but investigators say they have found  no proof of Trump committing  a crime with Epstein. Political commentator Jack Cocchiarella reacts to the latest Trump Epstein scandal. Trump PANICS As Fox Host ADMITS Epstein CHILD CRIMES On Air! Here’s the breakdown. 1. What the official investigations say A recent DOJ/FBI memo reviewing the Epstein case states there is no evidence of a “ client list ,” blackmail operation, or additional uncharged co-conspirators that they can credibly pursue.  When the DOJ and FBI release a memo insisting there is “no evidence” of a client list, no blackmail network, and no additional co-conspirators to pursue, many observers question whether the statement reflects the truth or simply the limits of what the government is willing to acknowledge. The Epstein case has always operated in the shadows of powerful interests, with sealed files , destroyed records , and...
Read more

Jonathan Pollard’s Warning and the Rising Strain Between U.S. and Israeli Power

Image
Jonathan Pollard ’s recent comments have reignited a long-running debate about the limits of U.S. –Israel cooperation  and the risks of allowing any ally to operate  with unchecked strategic autonomy. Jonathan Pollard, the convicted Israeli spy, openly admits Israel used NUCLEAR BLACKMAIL against America in 1973 — and says they should do it AGAIN today if the US ever cuts weapons. Former CIA officer John Kiriakou just revealed Israel threatened to nuke Iran’s underground sites unless Trump gave them bunker-buster bombs. Is this the real " Samson Option " — threatening to "nuke the Middle East" (and maybe even Europe or US allies) if abandoned? Israel THREATENS America By "NUKING The Middle East", Pollard Speaks  Pollard, a former U.S. intelligence analyst convicted of spying for Israel, has increasingly spoken in ways that challenge America’s authority in the region. His claim that Israel should act without regard for Washington’s approval —paired with h...
Read more