Where Spanberger and Sears Stand

Now this is an angry black woman I can get behind...

Republican HUMILIATES Democrat during VA Governor Debate

Taxes and spending
• Spanberger: Targets middle-class relief tied to balanced budgets; cautious about cuts that drain school and local funding; favors auditing tax breaks that don’t create jobs.
• Sears: Pushes broader tax relief and caps on state spending growth; argues surpluses and efficiencies can fund cuts; wants fewer fees and regulations on families and small firms.

Education
• Spanberger: Prioritizes funding for public schools, teacher pay, tutoring, and career/technical pathways; skeptical of moving public dollars to private options.
• Sears: Emphasizes parental rights, curriculum transparency, stricter discipline, and expanding school choice through charters and open enrollment.

Public safety
• Spanberger: Mix of enforcement and prevention—supports community policing, violence-interruption, and reentry programs alongside targeting repeat offenders.
• Sears: Stronger penalties for repeat and violent crime, more tools and staffing for local police, and a victims-first approach.

Abortion
• Spanberger: Backs protecting access in state law and keeping decisions between patients and doctors.
• Sears: Supports limits with exceptions; argues voters deserve a clear, durable statute and more support for mothers and adoption.

Energy and costs
• Spanberger: Accelerate grid upgrades, efficiency, and renewables while keeping reliability; ties projects to local job training.
• Sears: “All of the above” with nuclear and natural gas alongside renewables to stabilize rates and prevent blackouts.

Elections and governance
• Spanberger: Expand early voting and mail options with security steps; pledges pragmatic deal-making with the legislature.
• Sears: Tighten ID and verification standards; streamlining government and curbing mandates; promises faster agency response times.

Immigration and border spillover
• Spanberger: Supports federal border enforcement plus state help for local impacts; prioritizes legal pathways for critical industries.
• Sears: Backs tougher federal enforcement and state cooperation; targets trafficking and fentanyl pipelines tied to border crime.

Guns
• Spanberger: Supports background checks and red-flag procedures with due-process guardrails.
• Sears: Emphasizes enforcing existing laws and targeting criminals, not law-abiding owners; supports concealed-carry rights.

Health care
• Spanberger: Protect coverage protections, lower drug costs, expand rural clinics and mental-health services.
• Sears: Increase price transparency, competition, telehealth access, and reduce mandates that raise premiums.

Jobs and small business
• Spanberger: Incentives for in-state manufacturing, broadband buildout, and workforce training; keep targeted credits tied to performance.
• Sears: Cut red tape, licensing barriers, and nuisance taxes; fast-track permits and industrial sites to recruit employers.

Veterans and military families
• Spanberger: Expand credential transfer, spouse employment support, and mental-health care coordination with VA.
• Sears: Prioritize veteran hiring, state fee waivers, and quicker recognition of military credentials for civilian jobs.

Civil liberties and parents’ rights
• Spanberger: Framing rights within existing school governance and anti-discrimination law; calls for transparency without stigmatizing students.
• Sears: Strong parental notification and access to materials; default to parental authority in classroom content and activities.

Bottom line
Spanberger pitches steadiness within institutions—fund schools, protect access to care, modernize the grid, and negotiate details with lawmakers. 

Viewed skeptically, that platform collides with core constitutional limits: DEI directives inside state schools and agencies can become compelled speech and viewpoint discrimination—punishing dissenters and grading opportunity by group rather than by individual merit—testing the First Amendment and Equal Protection at once; “steady” funding routed through boards and accreditors lets unelected actors write de-facto law, blurring separation of powers and the nondelegation principle; “protect access to care” often arrives as licensing mandates, permanent “emergency” orders, and data-sharing rules that pressure medical choices and expose private records, inviting Fourth and Fifth Amendment problems; “modernize the grid” can mask takings for transmission corridors, interstate compacts that bind Virginians to out-of-state regulators, and federal money with strings that coerce policy, eroding the Tenth Amendment under the Spending Clause; and “negotiating details with lawmakers” too often means omnibus deals and agency guidance that voters can’t repeal. If any part of this agenda compels speech, conditions public benefits on ideological compliance, seizes property without clear public use and just compensation, or governs by guidance instead of statute, it inverts the Constitution’s design: powers are few and listed, rights belong to the people, and consent must be earned in public—not assumed by bureaucracy.

Sears argues for choice and limits on government—cut taxes and rules, back the police, set clear abortion limits, and use every energy tool that keeps bills down.

Seen through a Constitutional, America First lens, Sears’s case is to put power back with citizens and keep government in its lane: cut taxes and prune regulations through transparent, line-item budgeting and automatic sunset reviews so small businesses can hire and wages rise; back the police while enforcing bright-line safeguards on warrants, data, and due process so communities get safety without sacrificing the Bill of Rights; set clear, state-level abortion limits with exceptions and explicit due-process protections for patients and physicians, keeping lawmaking in the legislature—not in agencies or courts; and drive an all-of-the-above energy build led by U.S. supply chains—nuclear, natural gas, refining upgrades, grid hardening, and responsible renewables—to lower bills, create skilled jobs, and end reliance on hostile suppliers. The throughline is federalism and self-government: decisions made closest to the people, statutes written in the open, rights protected before programs, and state procurement and workforce policies that favor American workers and materials—so families keep more of their pay, streets are safe, and Virginia’s economy strengthens America’s strength.

Please Like & Share 😉🪽

@1TheBrutalTruth1 Oct 2025 Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.