The Brutal Truth. Articles, stories, commentaries, videos, etc. are all Conservative based. We present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. The opinions expressed through the thousands of stories here do not necessarily represent those of The Brutal Truth.
We are not going to censor the news and information here. That is for you to do.
Algeria and Pakistan Confront Israel at UN After Qatar Strike
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
The strike in Doha raised alarms not only because of its timing but because it pierced the illusion that Qatar, a U.S. ally and host of American bases, was untouchable ground.
Hitting Hamas leaders while they were reviewing a U.S.-backed ceasefire proposal suggests more than coincidence—it hints at either intelligence sharing gone awry or deliberate sabotage of diplomacy. By striking within Qatar’s capital, Israel sent a message that no state’s sovereignty is beyond reach if it shelters groups Israel deems a threat, even at the risk of destabilizing a partner nation and provoking global outrage. The fact that top Hamas leaders reportedly survived while relatives and guards were killed deepens suspicion that the attack was more about psychological warfare—showing power and sowing fear—than achieving decisive military gains.
U.S. Reaction & Trump’s Stance
Trump’s response revealed the tightrope Washington is walking between its loyalty to Israel and its reliance on Qatar as both mediator and host to U.S. military assets.
By calling the strike “very unhappy in every aspect,” he signaled disapproval without crossing into outright condemnation, leaving space for Israel’s justification while calming Qatar’s fury. The admission that his envoy’s warning came too late raises questions about whether the U.S. was aware of Israel’s plans all along and failed to act, or whether Israel deliberately blindsided its ally.
Promising Qatar that such an attack “would not happen again” highlights how destabilizing this was for America’s regional credibility, but also exposes how little leverage Washington may have over Netanyahu’s government. In effect, Trump’s balancing act underscores the perception that U.S. policy is less about steering events and more about damage control after Israel makes unilateral moves that force Washington into awkward diplomacy.
The international reaction revealed a deep hypocrisy at the highest levels of diplomacy: Qatar and its Gulf allies condemned the violation of sovereignty as a blatant breach of international law, yet when the UN Security Council finally responded, the statement condemned the “attacks” without daring to name Israel as the responsible party.
This deliberate omission shows how global institutions bend language to shield certain states, reducing accountability to vague expressions that satisfy procedure but dodge truth. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and others rallied behind Qatar, but their calls for restraint echoed more as symbolic gestures than real consequences.
The fact that even with U.S. participation the Council could not identify the aggressor exposes the imbalance of power, where some nations can launch strikes on foreign capitals and still escape formal blame, leaving the UN’s credibility fractured and the idea of equal justice under international law looking more like theater than enforcement.
Algeria and Pakistan’s interventions at the UN stood out because they cut through the diplomatic fog that other nations seemed content to hide behind. Algeria’s insistence that failing to name Israel only feeds impunity was a direct challenge to the Security Council’s credibility, highlighting how selective accountability breeds endless cycles of violence. Pakistan’s statement went further, not only condemning the attack as a violation of international norms but also questioning the sincerity of peace talks and hostage negotiations that were supposedly underway when the strike occurred. Together, their voices framed the attack as more than just another regional flare-up—it became a test of whether international institutions are tools of justice or shields for powerful states, and whether smaller nations will continue to accept a system where the rules are enforced selectively depending on who pulls the trigger.
@1TheBrutalTruth1 Sept 2025 Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
Between 28:52 and 30:00 of the video, Charlie Kirk frames Jeffrey Epstein not just as an isolated predator but as a tool of influence and compromise. The lies about Charlie. Charlie in his own words. Questions about the investigation. They Are Lying About Charlie Kirk. | Candace Ep 235 - YouTube Between 28:52 and 30:00 of the video, Charlie Kirk frames Jeffrey Epstein not just as an isolated predator but as a tool of influence and compromise. He suggests Epstein’s network functioned as a “lever” for powerful elites—politicians, financiers, even intelligence services—to entrap and control people. He stresses that the scandal wasn’t only about private depravity but about systematic blackmail designed to ensure loyalty and silence. Kirk points to the strange protection Epstein enjoyed for years, implying he was too useful to certain powerful interests to be stopped until he became a liability. What ties these threads together is the idea of influence bought or weaponized: Charlie Kirk’s c...
People are asking why Charlie Kirk looked the way he did in his open casket — from the yellow hands, to the “waxy” appearance, to conspiracy theories that it wasn’t even him. As a licensed funeral director and embalmer, I’m breaking down what you’re really seeing. Why Charlie Kirk Looked That Way in His Casket (Embalmer Reacts) This is just a general look at how embalming can affect appearance. Every case is unique, and my goal is simply to share understanding, not to speak about any one person. Yellow discoloration of hands or skin can come from a few common causes: jaundice (liver failure or medications), postmortem chemical shifts, or the interaction of embalming fluids with blood pigments. Some are pointing to the yellowing of Charlie Kirk’s hands in the casket as proof of something sinister, but what isn’t being said is that discoloration like this often signals more than just “jaundice.” In cases of sudden or violent death, the body’s chemistry can shift unpredictably, creating p...
A Democratic congressional candidate in suburban Chicago says she was forcefully pushed to the pavement by a federal agent while protesting outside an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility early Friday morning. Video of the encounter circulated widely on social platforms and was later reported by multiple national and local news organizations. The candidate, Kat Abughazaleh, 26, said she suffered bruises and an injured hand and described agents firing pepper balls and deploying tear gas as the incident unfolded. Dem House candidate slammed to ground at ICE protest in Broadview The demonstration took place at the ICE facility in Broadview, Illinois, on September 19, 2025, as part of protests against a stepped-up federal immigration enforcement operation described by authorities as “Operation Midway Blitz.” About 100 people were present, according to accounts from protesters and reporters at the scene. Multiple clips — including footage posted by Abughazaleh and local news c...
Comments
Post a Comment