Big Issue In Comey Case EVERYONE MISSED!
Viewed from the outside-looking-in, the Comey indictment finally drags the long-festering leak-and-surveillance fights into a courtroom: a federal grand jury charged the former FBI director with false statements and obstruction tied to his 2020 Senate testimony about media leaks, a narrow case that could pry open discovery on who green-lit press contacts, how the FBI handled (or hid) problems in its FISA process, and whether exculpatory details and campaign-commissioned research were treated as fact; supporters call this overdue accountability and point to the DOJ inspector general’s finding of 17 major errors in the Carter Page warrants and to Durham’s report (and its newly declassified annex) raising concerns about 2016-era political intel, while critics call the case retaliation—flagging the rush and the newly installed U.S. attorney—and warn of selective prosecution; the America-first answer is sunlight and due process: unseal the records (emails, 302s, Woods files, leak communications), seat a jury, and let materiality and intent decide—if it’s thin, it dies in court; if it’s real, it sets a deterrent for unelected security officials who shade the truth.
Please Like & Share 😉🪽
@1TheBrutalTruth1 Sept 2025 Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
Comments
Post a Comment