Did Obama and His Team Break Rules in 2016? What We Learned from New Documents

A new set of documents unveiled by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard raises big questions about what happened in 2016. You see, before the election, U.S. intelligence experts said there was no proof that Russia changed votes or hacked voting systems. 


But then, after the election, a different report—used in national briefings—said Russia tried to influence the election in favor of Donald Trump The Gateway Pundit+9The Guardian+9mint+9.

Now, Gabbard is calling this a serious betrayal. She says leaders like President Obama, James Clapper, John Brennan, and James Comey knew the original finding that Russia didn’t change votes—but then changed the story anyway. She has labeled it “a treasonous conspiracy” and wants the Department of Justice to look into itThe Economic Times+4Politico+4The Daily Beast+4.

This matters for three big reasons:

  • Truth vs. Spin: If the first intelligence report was accurate, but then decision-makers reshaped the story—adding unverified elements—that could mean they misled the public and pressured other agencies.

  • Bigger Shadow Game: Some people suggest this new focus is meant to distract from questions around Jeffrey Epstein—like a way to steer attention away from one controversy by reviving anotherThe Economic TimesThe Daily Beast.

  • What Comes Next: Rep. Jim Himes and others say this looks like a “reheated claim,” pointing back to earlier bipartisan investigations that found Russia did interfere—though not by changing votes, but by spreading propagandaThe Times of India+7Politico+7The Economic Times+7.

This matters in a way that goes deeper than just politics—it’s about trust, timing, and what might really be going on behind the scenes. If the first report said Russia didn’t change votes, and then leaders like Obama, Brennan, and Clapper allowed a second version to say something different, that’s not just bad judgment—that could mean they were trying to control what the American people believed. Now, with all the talk about Epstein back in the news, some believe this sudden focus on 2016 could be a clever way to turn attention away from powerful names tied to Epstein’s files. It’s like shaking the snow globe and pointing at the flakes, hoping no one notices what’s in the center. And when politicians like Rep. Himes say, “Oh, this is just old news,” it sounds more like they’re trying to shut down questions before they get too close to something real. Whether or not anyone faces justice, the timing and the silence from key figures leave people wondering what’s being hidden—and who’s still protecting it.

Big Picture

This story isn’t just about some dusty papers from years ago—it’s about whether the people at the very top of the government played a game with the truth. If leaders took one version of events, then changed it on purpose to make it say something else, that means the truth was never the goal—control was.

 When whistleblowers risk everything to reveal hidden memos, it tells us there’s more going on than what’s shown on TV. And if those memos prove that intelligence was twisted to make certain people look guilty—or to protect others—then it’s not just politics, it’s a plan. 

A plan that may have been used to push certain ideas, protect certain names, or distract the public while something much bigger was happening. People are starting to ask, not just “what happened,” but “who decided what we were allowed to believe?” 

And when that question goes unanswered, it shakes the very ground under everything we’re told to trust.


Key Recent Reports on 2016 Intel Changes
Obama administration whipped up Russia investigation in 'treasonous conspiracy,' Gabbard says
New York Post
Obama administration whipped up Russia investigation in 'treasonous conspiracy,' Gabbard says
Today
Tulsi Gabbard calls for Obama to be prosecuted over 2016 election claims
The Guardian
Tulsi Gabbard calls for Obama to be prosecuted over 2016 election claims
Today
Gabbard threatens prosecution against Obama administration officials for 'treasonous conspiracy'
Politico
Gabbard threatens prosecution against Obama administration officials for 'treasonous conspiracy'
Today


The Brutal Truth July 2025

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How could someone who’s gone still move money? And who had the power to do it without setting off alarms?

Image
After Jeffrey Epstein was reported dead in 2019, most people believed the story was over. But in February 2024, a report showed that large amounts of money—millions of dollars—were quietly moved from his bank accounts long after he was supposed to be dead. That raised big questions. Epstein’s Dead So Why Is His Bank Account  STILL Moving Millions!?! w/ Nick Bryant Some believe this points to something much deeper: that Epstein may not have really died, or that powerful people with access to his finances are hiding the truth. Others think intelligence agencies could be involved, either protecting secrets or protecting someone still alive. These strange money transfers make people wonder if his “death” was just a way to make him disappear —and keep what he knew from coming out. The Brutal Truth July 2025 The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teachi...
Read more

Netanyahu, the Rebbe, and the Messiah Prophecy

Image
 Why 'Messiah prophecy' haunts Netanyahu (1 year ago) Benjamin Netanyahu was told by a powerful Jewish religious figure that he would be Israel’s last leader and hand the scepter to the Messiah. How does this so-called prophecy affect Netanyahu’s political calculations? And who is the mysterious religious figure, honored by successive US presidents, simply known as The Rebbe? Why 'Messiah prophecy' haunts Netanyahu - YouTube Partial Transcript --  His hardline government has massively accelerated the construction of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, considered illegal under international law. It's also provoked massive protests by attempting to grab more power for itself at the expense of other branches of government. The protests threatened to bring down Netanyahu's government. But then on October 7th, everything changed. Breaking news out of Israel this morning where Hamas has launched a surprise attack—a massive surprise attack. Hundreds of Hamas fighter...
Read more

Portugal Pulls the Brakes on Mass Immigration—What’s Really Going On?

Image
Portugal .  That country, which used to have very easy immigration rules, has now approved a plan to tighten its borders . The government wants to create a new Immigration and Borders Unit inside the police, handle visas more strictly, limit family reunions for migrants, and rethink birth-based citizenship. Portugal Just Did the Unthinkable – Globalists Are Panicking  | Redacted w Clayton Morris  The changes were pushed through by the center-right leaders and a right-wing party called Chega , and now they’re waiting for the president to sign them into law. This shift shows Portugal is moving from being a friendly, open country to being more careful, even strict, about who can come in—and when. Why This Matters Even friendly countries are starting to say “enough.” Portugal was once known for welcoming people. Now it’s acting more like other big European countries that don’t want too many newcomers at once. Politics are rewiring. The center-right government is worki...
Read more