Can We Really Control Hurricanes? Bill Gates' Patents Raise Big Questions...

A long time ago, people believed only nature controlled the weather. But now, some very rich and powerful people think they might have a way to help—or possibly even change it. In 2008, Bill Gates and 12 other inventors filed patents for a plan that sounds like science fiction: changing the temperature of ocean water to steer, weaken, or even stop hurricanes before they hit land.

The idea is based on real science. Hurricanes get their strength from warm ocean water. Gates' team thought, “What if we cool the water down before the hurricane gets too big?” Their plan uses floating platforms or pipes to mix warm surface water with colder water from deep below. The U.S. Patent Office even approved one of the designs. Gates said it could be a “Plan B” for climate problems when normal solutions don’t work.

But not everyone is cheering.

Some people believe there could be a dark side to this kind of weather control. They worry that powerful people might use it not just to stop storms, but to move them or intensify them on purpose. This has led to concerns about weather being turned into a weapon—or a way to control where people live and who gets hurt during a disaster. They point to real events, like the deadly flooding in Kerrville, Texas, or massive storms like Hurricane Ian and Hurricane Helene, and ask, “Are these natural… or did someone push a button?”

Even though the patents say the goal is to help, critics say trying to control weather could backfire. Changing one part of the climate might cause worse problems somewhere else—like heavier rainfall, surprise floods, or stronger hurricanes than expected.

And here’s where it gets even more controversial: Gates’ foundation has also been funding experiments in solar geoengineering, which means trying to reflect sunlight back into space to cool the Earth. Some scientists worry that if too much power is given to just a few hands, mistakes—or even secret actions—could affect millions of people without their knowledge or approval.

Right now, these patents are legal. The technology is real. But the world is still debating whether this is a helpful Plan B—or a dangerous path we’re not ready to walk down.

Hurricane-Taming Tech: Helper or Hidden Hazard?

In 2008, Bill Gates and a team of co-inventors filed for a patent that sounds like it came from a superhero story—technology that could steer, weaken, or even stop hurricanes! The idea uses special boats with pipes that mix cold deep-sea water into warm surface water. Since hurricanes get power from warm water, chilling the sea might slow or weaken them. Scientists say it might work, but only if you build a whole fleet—and that's expensive.

This invention isn’t just about stopping storms—it’s about humans trying to control nature. Some worry it sounds like using weather as a tool—or even a weapon. What if someone chooses where the boats go to steer a storm toward certain cities? Imagine if a city feels lucky and safe while another gets hit harder. There’s also concern that messing with ocean temperatures could break something else—like causing heavier rain or floods somewhere else.

Some people believe this idea of controlling hurricanes might not just be about helping—what if it’s actually about power?

 The patent looks like a plan to fight storms, but others think it might secretly be used to aim storms too. If one group controls the weather, they could decide who stays dry and who gets flooded. Some say that recent deadly storms and surprise floods might not all be natural, especially when the weather patterns seem so strange. Others point out that this isn’t the first time powerful people have talked about changing the weather. They wonder if these ocean-cooling machines could be part of a bigger system already being tested in secret. So while it may sound like science helping the planet, it also opens the door to big questions—like who really controls the sky, and can we trust them?

Real Worries

• Natural Balance: Changing ocean heat might help one place but hurt others.

• Uneven Power: Whoever controls the boats could decide which regions get protected—and which don’t.

• Hidden Consequences: Maybe the plan works once—but next time it could cause a super-storm or strange weather far away.

Some people worry that changing the ocean’s temperature to stop hurricanes might do more harm than good. The ocean is like a giant engine that helps balance Earth’s weather, and if you cool one spot too much, it might mess up another part—like causing droughts or super-storms in places that weren’t expecting them. The biggest concern is about control. If only a few people or companies can steer storms, they could choose which cities get saved and which ones take the hit. That means powerful groups could secretly pick winners and losers. And even if the plan works one time, the next time it might backfire—making storms worse or creating strange weather no one planned for. It’s kind of like trying to fix one leak in a dam but ending up cracking the whole wall.

And what if its not to stop hurricanes but to START them?

If the same technology meant to weaken hurricanes could also be used to start or strengthen them, that would raise serious concerns. The system that cools or warms ocean water could, in theory, be reversed—adding heat instead of taking it away. Hurricanes feed off warm water, so heating the sea surface could actually create storms or make them more powerful. Some people fear this could turn weather into a weapon—where someone secretly causes a storm to hit an enemy or disrupt an area. If a powerful storm suddenly appears in the Gulf or near a military base, and there's no clear natural reason, people might start asking who triggered it. Just like turning off a faucet can stop water, turning it on in the wrong way could cause a flood. And if someone controls that faucet, they hold power over places, people, and even entire countries—without ever firing a single shot.

There are Some who believe Katrina was a created hurricane.

Yes, there are some people who believe that Hurricane Katrina, which devastated New Orleans in 2005, was not entirely natural. They think it may have been influenced—or even created—by advanced weather-control technology. This idea comes from the fact that Katrina was not just powerful, but also unusually destructive in how and where it hit. Some point to suspicious patterns in how it intensified quickly over warm Gulf waters, then changed course at just the right angle to slam into the most vulnerable part of the city.

Supporters of this theory often mention programs like HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program), which can heat parts of the upper atmosphere using radio waves. Others point to patents like the ones connected to Bill Gates or earlier weather-modification experiments from military sources during the Cold War. They believe these tools could possibly push storms, fuel them, or change their direction.

They also ask: why did the levees break so suddenly and in specific places? Why were so many federal systems slow to respond? Was this an example of “disaster capitalism,” where chaos was used to clear out neighborhoods for new development?

While there's no official proof to support these claims, the idea that Katrina was engineered continues to fuel discussions about how much control governments or private groups may already have over the weather—and what they're willing to do with it.

Not to mention his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein...

Bill Gates’ well-documented ties to Jeffrey Epstein raise red flags for many people who already question the motives behind his projects. Even though Gates has tried to distance himself, reports show that he met with Epstein multiple times, even after Epstein was a convicted sex offender. Some meetings reportedly involved discussions about philanthropy and funding science projects—topics that overlap with Gates’ climate and public health work.

Critics wonder: if Gates was truly focused on helping the world, why associate with someone like Epstein? And if shady deals or hidden agendas were being discussed behind closed doors, could some of those plans—like weather control, vaccine policies, or data collection—actually serve private interests rather than public good?

When you mix weather patents, storm disasters, and high-level friendships with someone like Epstein, it’s no wonder people start asking deeper questions. It doesn’t mean everything is part of a plan—but it does mean people are right to be skeptical when the same names show up over and over in powerful and mysterious places.

...And his mRNA drugs

Yes, Bill Gates has been one of the biggest backers of mRNA technology, which played a major role in the COVID-19 vaccines. Through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, he invested heavily in companies like Moderna and partnered with global health groups to push vaccine development—especially in poor or developing countries. On the surface, this seems helpful. But not everyone sees it that way.

Some believe the mRNA rollout wasn’t just about health—it was a test run for a new kind of medicine that lets companies patent your biology. Unlike older vaccines that use weakened viruses, mRNA sends instructions to your cells to make part of the virus—basically reprogramming your body. Critics argue this could open the door to more genetic manipulation, all under the banner of "public health." And once this platform becomes normal, future shots might not be optional. There’s already talk of mRNA being used for cancer, flu, and even livestock, meaning it could soon be in food supply chains.

Then there’s the transparency issue. Gates isn’t a doctor, but he’s been treated like a world health authority. He’s helped shape global health policy through groups like GAVI and CEPI, often without public input. This creates a strange situation—one wealthy tech figure influencing what medicines people are told they must take.

Some also point out that Gates previously mentioned using vaccines to reduce population growth—not by harming people, but by slowing birth rates as living conditions improve. Still, that phrase—“population control”—raises eyebrows when you connect it with weather patents, Epstein ties, and mRNA experiments.

Altogether, it paints a picture that’s hard to ignore. Even if Gates means well, the power he holds over medicine, data, climate, and global policy has grown too massive for comfort.

Final Word:

Here’s another way to think about it—while everyone’s busy blaming Bill Gates for the things he’s funded or patented, maybe the real issue is being ignored. 

People in power much closer to us—our mayors, our governors, and even the President—are the ones allowing these programs to happen in our skies, our food, and our neighborhoods. If they really didn’t agree with these ideas, why aren’t they standing up and saying no? Why aren’t they passing laws to protect us?

 Tennessee already proved it’s possible when they passed a bill to stop any kind of chemical spraying in the sky. That means other states can do the same. But they haven’t. That tells us something big: maybe the ones we vote for are either too scared, too controlled, or too involved to make a change. 

And if that’s the case, then the solution won’t come from blaming billionaires—it’ll come from regular people who start paying attention, asking questions, and refusing to stay quiet.

Sources:

• ABC News reported the patent applications in 2009 showing boats that chill ocean water patents.google.com+10abcnews.go.com+10abcnews.go.com+10.

• Discover Magazine explained how the pipes would work and that experts say it might weaken hurricanes discovermagazine.com.

• Patent documents describe vessels that mix deep, cold water with surface water through long pipes patents.google.com.

The Brutal Truth July 2025 Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.