These are Questions we will address Today.
Did the Rothschilds create the modern state of Israel: A move of man instead of a prophetic move of God? Who is living in Israel today: Are the Jews in Israel not real Jews? Some say they are the 'Khazars' instead.
These are Questions we will address Today.
Did the Rothschilds Build Israel and Are Israelis Really Khazars?
In recent debates, two persistent questions resurface: Did the wealthy Rothschild family engineer the creation of modern Israel? And are today’s Israeli Jews actually descendants of Khazars rather than Israelites? Let’s look at these claims through conservative and centrist lenses, using what history and science tell us.
The story of the Rothschilds often centers on Baron Edmond de Rothschild, who in the early 1900s financed vineyards, settlements, and Jewish communal infrastructure in Palestine. Known as “HaNadiv HaYadu’a” (the Benefactor), his support helped early Zionist pioneers build farms and towns—though he never dictated political direction or state policy ajc.org+14en.wikipedia.org+14youtube.com+14. A 2024 fact-check by AAP confirms that, while influential, the family did not create Israel or control its founding aap.com.au.
Today, some suggest the Rothschilds held the reins of Israel as a secretive cabal—but mainstream historians dismiss this. The state’s creation sprang from the Zionist movement, British diplomacy (anchored in the 1917 Balfour Declaration), and United Nations resolutions—not private banking influence.
The second claim, that Israelis are Khazars in disguise, is rooted in a medieval history. In the 8th–10th centuries, the Khazar elite in the Caucasus converted to Judaism—but scholars agree there’s little evidence these converts broadly populated Eastern Europe or formed Ashkenazi Jewry aap.com.auen.wikipedia.org. Modern genetic studies also contradict the notion. A 2025 investigation found Ashkenazi Jews share clear Middle Eastern ancestry, deeply traceable to ancient Israel, and show scant connection to Khazaria en.wikipedia.org.
From a conservative viewpoint, the Rothschilds’ involvement is praised as beneficent support rather than conspiratorial engineering. Their philanthropy helped strengthen a fledgling community, and modern Israelis overwhelmingly descend from biblical Israelites, not Khazars—reinforcing Israel's historical and religious claims to the land.
A more centrist perspective acknowledges both facts and narratives. The Rothschilds were important early sponsors, but the formation of Israel was a complex, multi-party process. And while the Khazar conversion is an interesting historical note, it doesn’t overturn the deep genetic and cultural ties Israelis have with the ancient Levant.
In summary, the Rothschilds were generous backers—not kingmakers—and modern Israelis are not Khazars by any meaningful measure. Knowing these distinctions helps focus the conversation on real history, identity, and heritage without veering into myths or conspiracies.
The Rothschild Blueprint and the Question of Israel’s True Lineage
A growing chorus of alternative researchers and historians argue that the founding of the modern state of Israel was not a fulfillment of divine prophecy, but a carefully orchestrated political maneuver—heavily influenced, if not directed, by one of history’s most secretive and powerful banking families: the Rothschilds.
According to these fringe theorists, the Rothschilds, long rumored to possess unparalleled financial sway over global institutions, were not merely benefactors of early Jewish settlements in Palestine. Instead, they are viewed as the architects of a long-range plan to reshape the Middle East for geopolitical and financial advantage. The 1917 Balfour Declaration—commonly cited as a foundational moment for modern Israel—was, in this view, less about Jewish self-determination and more about British imperial interests, with Lord Walter Rothschild serving as the symbolic recipient of a carefully worded promise. Critics argue this “gift” of Palestine was made without the consent of its native Arab inhabitants, laying the groundwork for decades of conflict.
What fuels these theories further is the argument that today's Israeli population does not primarily descend from the ancient tribes of Israel. Instead, some fringe researchers assert that Ashkenazi Jews, who make up the majority of Israel’s Jewish population, are descendants of Khazars—a Turkic people whose ruling class allegedly converted to Judaism in the 8th or 9th century. These theorists argue that this lineage breaks the prophetic chain that connects modern Jews to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.
Proponents of this theory often reference Arthur Koestler’s book The Thirteenth Tribe, in which he posits that much of Eastern European Jewry might trace its origins to Khazaria rather than the ancient Levant. In this view, the state of Israel is thus a political construct, established by those without an ancestral or divine claim to the land, yet justified through biblical narratives that may not apply to them.
Some go even further, suggesting that the Rothschilds’ influence extends into esoteric Zionism, where the creation of Israel is seen not as a biblical restoration, but a step toward consolidating financial and spiritual control in Jerusalem—a necessary move in various apocalyptic or Messianic endgame visions held by elite groups.
This line of thought, while widely rejected in mainstream circles, continues to attract attention among those suspicious of global power structures. It often intermingles with broader critiques of globalist influence, central banking, and the role of secretive elites in shaping world events under the guise of religious or humanitarian goals.
It’s important to note that these claims are not supported by most historians or scientists. Genetic studies widely show that modern Jews, including Ashkenazi populations, have significant Levantine ancestry. And mainstream historians emphasize that the creation of Israel was a complex and multilayered process involving Zionist leaders, Holocaust trauma, British imperial withdrawal, and UN resolutions—not the single-handed plot of a banking family.
Still, the fringe narrative persists—linking questions of spiritual legitimacy, ancient prophecy, and modern power into a web that continues to challenge conventional understandings of one of the most contentious regions on earth.
Sources & links:
-
Britannica: Zionism movement and Balfour Declaration m.youtube.com
-
AAP Fact Check: “Rothschild conspiracy is ‘utter nonsense’” aap.com.au+1politifact.com+1
-
Wikipedia: Edmond de Rothschild’s role in early Palestine washingtonpost.com+3en.wikipedia.org+3x.com+3
-
Wikipedia: Genetic studies of Jews reject Khazar origin theory m.youtube.com+2en.wikipedia.org+2en.wikipedia.org+2
-
Wikipedia: Khazars and their conversion to Judaism ajc.org+10en.wikipedia.org+10m.youtube.com+10
THE BRUTAL TRUTH JUNE 2025
The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
Comments
Post a Comment