Benjamin Freedman Speech 1961, what really happened in ww2, History, NON-propaganda

Benjamin Freedman Speech 1961, what really
happened in ww2, History, NON-propaganda

Benjamin H. Freedman’s 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel is not fully in the public domain, and it isn’t available in a verified, public-domain text format. However, a partial transcript is accessible on archive.org, which includes a portion of his introduction and themes. I can’t provide the full text verbatim, but here's a detailed summary and select excerpts to give you a sense of its content and tone:

🎙️ Summary of Freedman’s Willard Hotel Speech (1961)

Benjamin H. Freedman, a former Jewish businessman turned outspoken critic of Zionism, delivered a nearly two-hour address in Washington, D.C., sponsored by Common Sense newspaper. He claimed insider status and warned that Zionist influence had heavily shaped U.S. policy—from World Wars to modern-day diplomacy.

Key points:

Claimed U.S. entry into World War I was, in part, due to Zionist pressure on President Wilson and his advisors—terminating major German victories in Europe en.wikisource.org+10archive.org+10highlanderjuan.com+10.
Asserted Zionist leaders had declared a “holy war” against Germany during the rise of Hitler fisheaters.com.
Warned that Zionist influence would drag America into future conflicts, including against Arab nations, particularly over U.S. support of Israel .
Claimed individual insiders (e.g., Morgenthau, General Houseies) were complicit in advancing Zionist goals—drawing upon his own alleged experience at political meetings.

✍️ Excerpts from the Speech

“Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co‑religionists have complete control of our government… What happened while we were all asleep?”
(Introduction section) archive.org+2archive.org+2fisheaters.com+2

“World War I… Germany had won that war… then Zionists… intervened… sending our boys over there to be slaughtered… so the Jews can have Palestine as their commonwealth.”
(On U.S. involvement in World War I) archive.org

“For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War… the curtain goes up on Act 3… The Jews of the world… are determined… to permanently retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government.”
(On looming conflict and Zionist ambition) archive.org

🧭 Context & Legacy

Freedman was known for his controversial anti‑Zionist and antisemitic positions. Mainstream historians and factual experts consistently debunk his claims—especially around historical causation and motives. That said, his speech continues to circulate in alternative media circles and remains a subject of debate highlanderjuan.com+6reddit.com+6en.wikipedia.org+6.

📚 If You Want More

Audio Recording (87–156 min): Available via archive.org and SoundCloud jwa.org+3archive.org+3loc.gov+3.
Partial Transcript: Includes the speech’s introduction and key passages archive.org+10archive.org+10fisheaters.com+10.
Secondary Commentary: Discussions and transcripts appear on sites like FishEaters.com fisheaters.com.

NOTES

Is there truth to this?:

“World War I… Germany had won that war… then Zionists… intervened… sending our boys over there to be slaughtered… so the Jews can have Palestine as their commonwealth.”
(On U.S. involvement in World War I)

The claim that “Germany had won World War I” and that “Zionists intervened to bring the U.S. into the war in exchange for Palestine” is a fringe theory with deep historical distortion. Let’s break it down into its main parts and assess them against the facts:

1. Did Germany “win” World War I before the U.S. entered?

No. By early 1917, the war was at a bloody stalemate. Germany had some early victories but was:

Facing severe supply shortages from the British naval blockade.
Losing men and resources faster than it could replenish them.
Watching its allies (e.g., Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire) begin to collapse.

The idea that Germany was on the verge of victory is a simplification. They may have been “winning battles,” but not winning the war in any sustainable way.

2. Did Zionists push the U.S. into WWI in exchange for Palestine?

This claim originates with Benjamin Freedman and similar fringe theorists who cite the Balfour Declaration (1917) as evidence.

The Balfour Declaration was a British document, not an American one. It was a letter from British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, supporting the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. However:

It had more to do with British imperial strategy than American foreign policy.
There is no credible evidence that a Zionist “deal” brought America into the war.
President Woodrow Wilson cited unrestricted submarine warfare by Germany (e.g., the Lusitania sinking) and Zimmermann Telegram (Germany encouraging Mexico to attack the U.S.) as the key reasons for joining the war.

3. Was U.S. involvement in WWI about giving Jews Palestine?

No. There’s no documented link between U.S. war policy and any Zionist agenda. The U.S. government at the time was far more concerned with:

German threats in the Atlantic.
Protecting European allies and trade.
Growing anti-German sentiment at home.

Conclusion:

This theory oversimplifies and misrepresents complex historical events. While some Zionist leaders supported the Allies and had contact with British officials (like Chaim Weizmann), there’s no credible evidence that a secret deal involving the U.S., Zionists, and Germany determined the outcome of WWI or the fate of Palestine.

It is a fringe claim, often used in narratives that blend anti-Zionist or antisemitic rhetoric with geopolitical revisionism.

What was the meaning behind this statement?:

“Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co‑religionists have complete control of our government… What happened while we were all asleep?”

The statement, “Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co‑religionists have complete control of our government… What happened while we were all asleep?” was made by Benjamin H. Freedman in his 1961 speech, and it reflects a deeply conspiratorial worldview. Here's a breakdown of its meaning and implications, particularly from both a historical and a fringe theory lens:

Literal Interpretation (From Freedman’s Perspective)

Freedman believed that Zionists, and by extension Jewish interests aligned with Zionism, had infiltrated and taken control of key sectors of the U.S. government, foreign policy, media, and financial systems. He framed this control as covert and manipulative, suggesting that the American people were deceived or unaware—"asleep"—while this influence quietly expanded.

This statement encapsulates his central claim: that American sovereignty and political decision-making were being subverted by a foreign or ideologically aligned group with interests not rooted in American values but in the geopolitical aims of global Zionism—chiefly, the creation and defense of Israel.

Fringe Theory Interpretation

In the fringe political and conspiratorial ecosystem, this quote is often cited to support broader claims that:

U.S. foreign policy, especially in the Middle East, disproportionately favors Israel not for strategic reasons, but due to Zionist manipulation or AIPAC-style lobbying.
Wars (such as in Iraq or support for interventions in Syria and Iran) are fought for Israeli interests, not America's.
The U.S. media and financial systems are controlled or influenced by a global Zionist network.
Cultural and political shifts (especially on morality, globalism, or immigration) are being engineered by "elites" influenced by Zionist ideology.

These are common themes in New World Order theories, often tied to critiques of globalism and technocracy.

Mainstream Rebuttal and Historical Perspective

Most historians, scholars, and watchdog groups (like the ADL and SPLC) have identified statements like this as antisemitic conspiracy rhetoric. While it's factual that:

Pro-Israel lobbying exists (as do countless other lobby groups),
And that Zionism is a political movement rooted in Jewish national identity,

… the claim of total governmental control is unsubstantiated and often used to delegitimize Jewish political participation or to explain global events through a single ethnic or religious lens—something characteristic of conspiratorial thinking rather than scholarly analysis.

Why it Still Resonates in Some Circles

Despite widespread rejection in mainstream discourse, this quote is still popular in:

Far-right and ultra-nationalist circles.
Anti-globalist movements.
Certain radical leftist factions that oppose Israeli statehood.
Online forums that question 9/11, U.S. wars, and the Federal Reserve.

In those spaces, the quote symbolizes the idea that citizens have lost control of their government—not just to corruption or global elites, but specifically to a Zionist agenda.

If you’d like, I can dive deeper into:

Verifying specific historical claims.
Exploring mainstream rebuttals and fact-checks.
Providing comparative context with established historical studies.

Contact me by email DeniseGradin@gmx.us

with subject Benjamin Freedman Speech 1961

THE BRUTAL TRUTH JUNE 2025

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

Search This Blog