LIVE: Shocking Scenes At USAID Hearing - Congress Members Stunned By Drag Show Funding | Trump,DOGE
The House Foreign Affairs Committee recently convened a session titled "The USAID Betrayal," scrutinizing the allocation of foreign aid funds to programs such as drag shows and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives abroad. Chairman Brian Mast highlighted several grants, including $1.5 million to promote job opportunities for LGBTQ individuals in Serbia and $8,000 to promote DEI among LGBTQ groups in Cyprus.
Many conservatives argue that USAID has long been a tool for leftist social engineering, funneling taxpayer dollars into progressive agendas that do little to serve American interests. Instead of focusing on genuine humanitarian aid, economic development, and strategic foreign policy objectives, the agency has prioritized funding for activist-driven programs that push radical cultural shifts onto other nations. Critics see this as yet another example of Washington elites misusing public funds to promote ideological policies abroad while Americans struggle with inflation, a weakened job market, and domestic crises that remain unaddressed. Calls for dismantling USAID or dramatically restructuring it continue to grow as more evidence surfaces of reckless spending that does little to advance U.S. national security or economic prosperity.
gop-foreignaffairs.house.gov+1Wikipedia+1
In response, President Donald Trump, alongside Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), initiated a comprehensive review of USAID expenditures. This led to the termination of over 90% of USAID's foreign aid contracts, amounting to $60 billion in global assistance. The DOGE team has also claimed substantial savings through fraud detection, asset sales, grant cancellations, workforce reductions, programmatic changes, and regulatory savings.
Conservatives view these cuts as a long-overdue correction to decades of wasteful spending that prioritized globalist agendas over the well-being of American citizens. For years, USAID has funneled billions into foreign projects with little accountability or measurable return for the American taxpayer, while domestic issues such as border security, infrastructure, and veterans' care have been neglected. Trump’s move to defund ineffective aid programs aligns with his America First vision, ensuring that U.S. resources benefit American workers and families first, rather than being squandered on politically motivated international initiatives. By slashing USAID’s bloated budget, conservatives argue that the administration is restoring fiscal responsibility and making government agencies accountable to the people who fund them.
wired.com+2The Times+2apnews.com+2abcnews.go.com
These actions have sparked significant controversy. Protests erupted in Washington, D.C., with former USAID employees and HIV activists staging demonstrations against the agency's dismantling, expressing concerns over the potential impact on global health initiatives. Democratic lawmakers have criticized the abrupt cuts, arguing that they undermine U.S. foreign policy objectives and global humanitarian efforts.
Many conservatives argue that Democrats' outrage over USAID cuts is nothing more than political theater, as they have long used foreign aid as a slush fund for special interests, activist groups, and ideological projects that have little to do with true humanitarianism. While the left claims these cuts jeopardize foreign policy, conservatives point out that the unchecked flow of taxpayer dollars into corrupt foreign governments and ineffective NGOs has done little to improve global stability or advance American interests. Instead of blindly funding projects with questionable accountability, Trump’s policies prioritize economic strength at home, national security, and ensuring that every tax dollar is spent wisely. By pushing back against wasteful international handouts, the administration is focusing on helping American families first—before sending billions overseas with no oversight.
The situation remains contentious, with debates ongoing about the balance between fiscal responsibility and maintaining the United States' role in international development and aid.
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.
Comments
Post a Comment