'I Just Wanna Get This Straight...': Jim Jordan Shocked By Judge Merchan Ruling At Trump Trial

At a House Judiciary Committee hearing held last week, Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI) and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) spoke about New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg's decision to charge former President Trump, and Judge Juan Merchan's decisions during the trial.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
 BOOM! Cruz Exposes Zelensky's 'Theater' During Biden Visit The washington examiner reports , Ted Cruz says Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenky is involved in "theater" during this week's visit from President Joe Biden.
Read more

Escalation Looms: Smotrich and Netanyahu Signal Continued Conflict in Gaza

Image
Smotrich ‘assured’ by Netanyahu that Israel will continue the war and take control of Gaza Far-right minister says he ‘received a commitment’ that there would be a gradual Israeli takeover of enclave, despite ceasefire sealed note–as always, a tsunami of important info that every Gentile with a vested interest in his/her own future survival needs to understand about all of this.  Or will it be something along the lines of a massive terrorist attack in the US that will be blamed on Hamas or some other ‘Islamic’ group tied to Hamas in order to paralyze POTUS DJT from moving forward with his plans of ending the wars in Gaza and throughout the rest of the Middle East as he has promised the American people (and to the rest of the world) that he would do? Screen shot and excerpt from --   Smotrich ‘assured’ by Netanyahu that Israel will continue the war and take control of Gaza – The Ugly Truth  Israeli leaders have made strong declarations about the future of Gaza, signaling a...
Read more

YouTube wasted no time taking down my Brutal Truth Show. It happened fast—too fast. Why? Because I dared to talk about COVID-19 and the problems with their so-called "faulty shots."

Image
  I didn’t just pull claims out of thin air, either. I went into full detail, breaking down the issues and even referencing a video that’s still on YouTube’s own platform. Let me get this straight: YouTube has that video available for everyone to see, but when I talk about it and add my perspective, suddenly it’s a problem? How does that make sense? If they’re okay with hosting the original video, why are they silencing me for highlighting it? It’s like they’re picking and choosing what can be said and who gets to say it. YouTube claims they’re cracking down on “misinformation,” but what about open discussions? What about the right to question things, especially when there are legitimate concerns? If their policies are supposed to stop harmful lies, why are they targeting shows like mine that use facts and sources? It feels like censorship, plain and simple. The frustrating part is, they hide behind the excuse of “following health authorities,” like the WHO and CDC. But let’s be ho...
Read more