Top Scientist: The Public Doesn't Realize It's All Fake

@hycoperosity5843

1 day ago

There are 42,000 scientists in the USA -polled only professionals and academics who held at least a bachelor’s degree in the fields of meteorology, climatology, physics, geology, and hydrology.

The key question of the survey asked: “In your judgement, what will be the overall impact of global climate change on living conditions for people alive today, across the globe?” Fifty-nine percent said, “significant harm.” Thirty-nine percent said either “significant improvement,” “slight improvement,” “no change,” or “slight harm.” Two percent were not sure.

Among respondents with the most experience – those at least 50-years-old – less than half expect significant harm for people alive today. Scientists 30-years-old and younger were the only age group for which more than 60 percent expect significant harm. It would seem that the school indoctrination centers did a good job brainwashing the youth.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Strange Things About The Plane Crash

Image
 Strange questions surrounding the midair collision of an American Airlines flight and a Blackhawk helicopter over Washington DC with some including the president himself suggesting it should have never happened.  What happened? Oh my God. Why was the Black Hawk reportedly flying dark near a busy airport?  Why didn't it take evasive action when Blackhawks have such adept maneuverability? The plane appears to have descended onto the helicopter. The Blackhawk helicopter appeared to be coming from the right of the commercial flight that was descending into Runway 33, but some claim the chopper flew directly into the American Airlines jet. Experts are baffled as to how traffic collision sensors failed. Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. More News Brutal Truth
Read more

YouTube wasted no time taking down my Brutal Truth Show. It happened fast—too fast. Why? Because I dared to talk about COVID-19 and the problems with their so-called "faulty shots."

Image
  I didn’t just pull claims out of thin air, either. I went into full detail, breaking down the issues and even referencing a video that’s still on YouTube’s own platform. Let me get this straight: YouTube has that video available for everyone to see, but when I talk about it and add my perspective, suddenly it’s a problem? How does that make sense? If they’re okay with hosting the original video, why are they silencing me for highlighting it? It’s like they’re picking and choosing what can be said and who gets to say it. YouTube claims they’re cracking down on “misinformation,” but what about open discussions? What about the right to question things, especially when there are legitimate concerns? If their policies are supposed to stop harmful lies, why are they targeting shows like mine that use facts and sources? It feels like censorship, plain and simple. The frustrating part is, they hide behind the excuse of “following health authorities,” like the WHO and CDC. But let’s be ho...
Read more

Bessent–Warren Clash Highlights Ongoing Debate Over Financial Risk and Regulation

Image
A public exchange between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Senator Elizabeth Warren has renewed attention on how the U.S. should balance financial regulation with economic growth.  Warren argued that proposals associated with President Donald Trump to roll back certain post-2008 safeguards risk recreating conditions that could lead to another major financial crisis. Her warning reflects a long-standing concern that reduced oversight encourages excessive risk-taking within the banking system. Bessent pushed back by pointing to the 2023 failures of several U.S. banks , noting that they occurred under a regulatory framework Warren supports. His response framed those collapses as evidence that heavy regulation alone does not prevent instability, emphasizing factors such as interest-rate exposure, management decisions, and concentrated business models. From this perspective, the issue is not simply the quantity of rules, but how supervision is executed and whether risks are ident...
Read more