The Brutal Truth. Articles, stories, commentaries, videos, etc. are all Conservative based. We present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. The opinions expressed through the thousands of stories here do not necessarily represent those of The Brutal Truth.
Been sharing the Truth for over 30 years -- Help me do another 30
https://buymeacoffee.com/denisegradin
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
The claim: Democrats held the nation’s longest filibuster for 75 days to attempt to prevent the passing of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
When senators want to put the brakes on legislation, they talk. And talk. And talk some more. That's called a filibuster.
Who holds the record for the longest filibuster? Recently a claim has made the rounds: "In 1964, on the floor of the U.S. Senate, Democrats held the longest filibuster in our nations history, 75 days. All trying to prevent the passing of one thing. The Civil Rights Act."
One Facebook user shared a post with the claim on social media on June 5. She did not respond when asked if she had any additional comments.
The Senate’s website states that the “longest continuous debate in Senate history” was about the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Prior to passing the act, Southern congressmen signed the “Southern Manifesto” to resist racial integration by all “lawful means,” states the Library of Congress’ exhibit, “The Civil Rights Act of 1964: A Long Struggle for Freedom.”
The Library of Congress website states the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights led to an attempt to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957.
The Senate site states President John F. Kennedy supported the act prior to his assassination and that President Lyndon B. Johnson encouraged Congress to pass the act in honor of Kennedy and to “end racial discrimination and segregation in public accommodations, public education, and federally assisted programs.”
Emanuel Celler, a New York Democrat, introduced the House’s version of a resolution on June 19, 1963, that would become the Civil Rights Act, according to an article in Smithsonian Magazine.
The House passed the bill on Feb. 10, 1964. It moved to the Senate on Feb. 26, 1964, and was placed on the Senate’s Judiciary Committee’s calendar, the Senate’s website states. The committee was chaired by civil rights opponent James Eastland of Mississippi.
According to Senate history, the issue was moved for consideration on March 9, 1964, when “Southern senators launched a filibuster against the bill,” with debates lasting 60 days.
Texas Faces Crossroads as THC Ban Awaits Governor's Decision Texas is at a pivotal moment regarding its hemp industry, as Senate Bill 3 (SB 3) sits on Governor Greg Abbott's desk. The bill proposes a ban on consumable hemp products containing any amount of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), including popular items like gummies, vapes, and beverages. If enacted, this legislation could significantly impact the state's $8 billion hemp industry and the estimated 50,000 jobs it supports. fox7austin.com +9 mysanantonio.com +9 fox7austin.com +9 mysanantonio.com +2 texastribune.org +2 apnews.com +2 beaumontenterprise.com +1 texastribune.org +1 Supporters of SB 3, including Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, argue that the ban is necessary to protect public health, particularly among youth. They express concerns over the accessibility and marketing of THC-infused products, suggesting that these items are often designed to appeal to younger consumers. Patrick has been vocal about his stan...
Ravensbrück wasn’t just another camp—it was a hidden testing ground where women were used in ways that are still shocking today. It was more than just a place of suffering. It became a silent lab where secret experiments were done on prisoners without their consent, all while officials claimed it was for science or war needs. Some of these so-called experiments were never truly about healing; they were about control, about seeing how much pain a human body could endure. Women were also forced to work like machines, day and night, while others were used to test cruel ideas in silence. And here’s the part few ever talk about: some of the women running the camp were just as brutal as the men—trained not just to obey but to enforce these horrors. This wasn’t just about war—it was about seeing how far a government could go when it stops seeing people as people. Remembering Ravensbrück is not only about what happened—it’s about asking why so many looked away. @heidipaulus3701 -- ...
Comments
Post a Comment