On Wednesday, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced that it has requested information from China regarding the increase in cases of respiratory diseases and clusters of pneumonia among children. [Reports emerged] that an unexplained pneumonia-like sickness is reportedly swiftly spreading through schools in China, leading to a surge of hospitalizations of children. According to the WHO, the authorities of China's National Health Commission reported an increase in the incidence of respiratory diseases in the country on November 13. On Tuesday, media outlets and the Emerging Diseases Monitoring Program of the International Society for Infectious Diseases "reported clusters of undiagnosed pneumonia in children in northern China."
Popular posts from this blog
YouTube wasted no time taking down my Brutal Truth Show. It happened fast—too fast. Why? Because I dared to talk about COVID-19 and the problems with their so-called "faulty shots."
I didn’t just pull claims out of thin air, either. I went into full detail, breaking down the issues and even referencing a video that’s still on YouTube’s own platform. Let me get this straight: YouTube has that video available for everyone to see, but when I talk about it and add my perspective, suddenly it’s a problem? How does that make sense? If they’re okay with hosting the original video, why are they silencing me for highlighting it? It’s like they’re picking and choosing what can be said and who gets to say it. YouTube claims they’re cracking down on “misinformation,” but what about open discussions? What about the right to question things, especially when there are legitimate concerns? If their policies are supposed to stop harmful lies, why are they targeting shows like mine that use facts and sources? It feels like censorship, plain and simple. The frustrating part is, they hide behind the excuse of “following health authorities,” like the WHO and CDC. But let’s be ho...
Bessent–Warren Clash Highlights Ongoing Debate Over Financial Risk and Regulation
A public exchange between Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Senator Elizabeth Warren has renewed attention on how the U.S. should balance financial regulation with economic growth. Warren argued that proposals associated with President Donald Trump to roll back certain post-2008 safeguards risk recreating conditions that could lead to another major financial crisis. Her warning reflects a long-standing concern that reduced oversight encourages excessive risk-taking within the banking system. Bessent pushed back by pointing to the 2023 failures of several U.S. banks , noting that they occurred under a regulatory framework Warren supports. His response framed those collapses as evidence that heavy regulation alone does not prevent instability, emphasizing factors such as interest-rate exposure, management decisions, and concentrated business models. From this perspective, the issue is not simply the quantity of rules, but how supervision is executed and whether risks are ident...
Comments
Post a Comment