Is anything is being done to get Soros, his son and their organization out of this country?

Are Efforts Underway to Remove George Soros and His Network from the U.S.?

In recent months, discussions have emerged among certain conservative groups questioning whether George Soros, his son Alex Soros, and their Open Society Foundations (OSF) should be compelled to leave the United States. These calls stem from a broader concern that their global philanthropy has grown too influential, especially in shaping U.S. politics, immigration policy, and social justice movements.

Critics point to Soros’s significant financial support—approximately $23 billion distributed since 1993—toward progressive causes such as migrant integration, civil rights advocacy, pro-democracy and green jobs initiatives wxii12.com+3foxnews.com+3timesofindia.indiatimes.com+3en.wikipedia.org. They argue that this level of sustained funding enables privately driven social change without public oversight. Major targets include voter protection efforts, criminal justice reform, and humanitarian assistance for migrants and refugees .

Republican lawmakers have occasionally pressured federal and state entities to scrutinize U.S. government grants funded by foreign-led organizations like OSF. In 2017, six senators urged an investigation into USAID and State Department grants linked to Soros’s network in Macedonia, Blair environments where national interests were deemed poorly served en.wikipedia.org. Meanwhile, conservative watchdog Judicial Watch routinely seeks public records concerning Soros-connected grants and investigations into alleged foreign influence en.wikipedia.org.

Despite these efforts, no actions directed at expelling Soros, his son, or shutting down their foundations have gained legal traction. OSF maintains its nonprofit status, engages in internal restructuring—recently scaling back some programs but doubling down on human rights and environmental defense initiatives foxnews.com+4apnews.com+4nypost.com+4. Alex Soros, now leading these efforts, continues championing democracy-building programs, including voting rights and gender equity cbsnews.com+1wxii12.com+1.

From a conservative standpoint, this situation underscores a struggle over whether powerful foreign-funded philanthropy should play a behind-the-scenes role in American policy. Supporters argue U.S. law permits such nonprofit participation, and OSF’s achievements in fostering democratic norms merit respect. Detractors counter that Soros’s influence lacks transparency, may steer domestic policy, and risks undermining democratic accountability.

Centrists offer a median view, acknowledging grants supporting human rights and awareness of foreign influence. They call for better disclosure of international philanthropic funding in domestic causes. This middle road favors reform—such as enhancing Transparency International-style standards—rather than advocating for expulsion or shutdown.

There is no evidence that legal processes exist to deport prominent donors or dissolve nonprofits due to ideological disagreement. Any attempt to remove Soros or OSF would face legal hurdles, risk accusations of infringing constitutional rights, and carve a precedent for restricting speech via financial influence.

For now, the debate remains political, not legal—a reflection of friction between domestic policy, global philanthropy, and how societies regulate influence. Whether more robust reporting, disclosure regulations, or congressional hearings come next remains uncertain. But it is clear the issue is far from settled.

---

Visual Media

• Infographic: Annual OSF expenditures by category (2022–2024)

• Video: Congressional hearing clip on foreign philanthropic influence

---

Fringe Report: “Shadow Sovereigns – Can Soros Be Expelled From America?”

Across underground forums, independent networks, and dissident platforms, a growing chorus of voices questions why George Soros and his son Alex remain so deeply embedded in American sociopolitical infrastructure. To these fringe theorists, Soros is not merely a billionaire philanthropist, but the architect of a parallel government—one that wields influence through NGOs, DA campaigns, and international lobbying more effectively than many elected officials.

Fringe circles assert that Soros-backed initiatives have quietly rewritten American policy. These include funding for open-border think tanks, support for District Attorneys who allegedly weaken law enforcement, and financial muscle behind globalist institutions. The 2016 migrant crisis, Ukraine’s Orange Revolution, and even early unrest in Ferguson are cited by critics as “signature destabilization” events underwritten, in part, by the Soros framework.

The Open Society Foundations, which have distributed over $30 billion globally, are said to form an invisible skeleton of influence—working through universities, civil rights groups, election systems, and media alliances. From this vantage, the Soros dynasty is accused of performing ideological regime change not just abroad, but within the United States.

As Alex Soros takes the reins, critics argue that the shift from global philanthropy to explicit domestic activism is intentional. Documents allegedly leaked from private briefings claim Alex is focusing OSF efforts on election outcomes in battleground states, including the strategic use of “social justice” as a gateway to erode voter ID laws and challenge legal standards.

Some fringe theorists claim quiet resistance is building behind the scenes. They believe a future Trump administration or populist wave could invoke the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) or declare OSF an “undesirable entity” under national security pretexts. Theorists cite as precedent the actions of Hungary and Russia—where Soros operations were banned outright. However, they also admit that doing so in the U.S. would require overcoming immense legal and political pushback, potentially inciting a constitutional crisis.

From a nationalist populist lens, this isn’t just about Soros—it’s about severing financial arteries that feed a globalist agenda at odds with American sovereignty. They say it is not a conspiracy, but a cold war of ideologies, where NGOs act as operatives rather than observers.

Fringe commentators also speculate on why no legal actions have been taken. Some allege bipartisan complicity, claiming that both parties have benefitted from Soros-related funding or avoided confrontation due to his media and legal apparatus. Others suggest that elite networks operate above legal accountability entirely.

One theory gaining traction is that removing Soros would spark a domino effect revealing too many “tied hands” in media, Big Tech, and public institutions. To those who believe this narrative, the question isn’t why Soros is still here—it’s why more Americans aren’t asking who truly governs them.

This article reflects fringe perspectives and is not an endorsement of any claims. The reader is encouraged to critically evaluate all information.

Sources and Links

• Wikipedia: Open Society Foundations total funding wxii12.comapnews.com+11en.wikipedia.org+11nypost.com+11

• AP News: OSF reaffirms human rights commitment under Alex Soros apnews.com+1cbsnews.com+1

• Reuters/The Times of Israel: Netanyahu claims Soros influence on migration policy timesofisrael.com+1en.wikipedia.org+1

• U.S. Senate letters, 2017: Requests for audit of USAID Soros-funded projects en.wikipedia.org+2en.wikipedia.org+2opensocietyfoundations.org+2

• New York Post & AP: Conservative dissent on Left-leaning funding networks including OSF nypost.com+9missioninvestors.org+9nypost.com+9

• Wikipedia: George Soros conspiracy theories context en.wikipedia.org+1en.wikipedia.org+1

THE BRUTAL TRUTH JUNE 2025

The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.