In the 2012 film Battleship , a big-budget naval action spectacle, there's a seemingly throwaway line that references Donald Trump. Delivered during a chaotic global conflict involving an alien invasion, the line barely registers for most viewers. Yet for those paying close attention to the patterns of predictive media and cultural messaging, it stands out as more than coincidence. The line mentioning Trump appears in the context of international crisis and government unpreparedness—an ironic note considering Trump was, at the time of the film’s release, merely a media personality, not a political figure. Yet by 2016, he would ascend to the presidency, navigating what many saw as an alien political environment: hostile media, deep state entrenchment, and unprecedented global tensions. The connection begins to feel like a subtle form of foreshadowing—intentional or not. More curiously, Battleship is a film about an unseen enemy, one that hijacks technology, evades standard detect...

The Brutal Truth June 2025 The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

When Professor Mohammad Marandi warned that a U.S.–Iran war is “all but certain” in the wake of the strikes on Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan, he wasn't merely reacting—he was laying bare a geopolitical trigger that was never about nukes but about seismic power realignment. According to Marandi’s interview, the sentiment in the Global South has shifted—irreversibly pro-Iranian—and he argues Iran won’t stand alone in what he describes as a likely U.S.–Israel campaign. In this narrative, Washington has already played its hand. MARANDI: U.S. MUST KNOW ABOUT IRAN'S MILITARY CAPABILITIES, WILL NOT BE BULLIED IN NUKE TALKS War as the Catalyst: The Realignment That Was Always Meant to Happen When Professor Mohammad Marandi declared that a U.S.–Iran war was “all but certain,” he wasn’t just forecasting conflict—he was revealing a deeper motive behind the recent airstrikes: a planned geopolitical realignment that has little to do with nuclear weapons and everything to do with shifting glob...

Amid heart-wrenching headlines— three children among sixteen aid seekers killed while waiting for food in Gaza—some analysts argue this isn’t just a tragic wartime accident. It’s part of what they see as a calculated drive to escalate violence, fracture regional alliances, and reshape global public opinion. According to Gaza’s Health Ministry, Israeli shelling around Khan Younis and Zeitoun claimed 16 civilian lives, including children, as they gathered for humanitarian aid washingtonpost.com . Official Israeli statements describe the chaos, cite warning shots, and promise investigations—but grassroots voices across alternative analysts view this differently: as a provocative tool to ignite international outrage, pressure allies, and justify deeper military intervention under the guise of restoring order. 1. Weaponizing Aid Lines Some believe that these deadly aid-site shellings are not merely collateral damage—but strategic strikes intended to force global powers to react. Once the...

Scott Jennings CLASHES With Tara Palmeri,  Says VIOLENCE Is a LEFTWING Problem | RISING When CNN’s Scott Jennings recently described Democrat anti-ICE protests as “porn for their base,” he wasn’t exaggerating—he was peeling back the curtain on a growing tactic: the deliberate use of lawbreaking and confrontation as a tool for public relations, political branding, and campaign fundraising. What looks like resistance is increasingly being seen as a carefully rehearsed performance . Prominent progressive lawmakers and activist influencers are being filmed “resisting” ICE agents, blocking vehicles, or chaining themselves to detention centers—all with camera crews conveniently positioned to catch every dramatic angle. These aren’t spontaneous acts of civil disobedience—they’re made-for-viral moments , ready for social media blasts, donation links, and campaign ad reels by sundown. Critics argue this behavior isn’t just performative—it’s calculated incitement . The goal? Stoke outrage, b...

In the wake of a dramatic arrest in Portland, conspiracy-minded commentators are claiming this is more than a lone extremist—it’s a symbol of a broader, allegedly orchestrated attack on American infrastructure and safety. On June 14, Alexander Robert Wick, a 38‑year‑old Portland activist associated with the “No Kings Day” protest, was charged with manufacturing and possessing an IED, attempting arson, and sabotaging I‑5 by throwing nails and traffic cones across lanes in an alleged effort to “blow up the freeway” ground.news +3 thegatewaypundit.com +3 profgalloway.com +3 . But beyond reporting the facts, some are spinning this into a narrative of coordinated domestic insurgency—claiming that ANTIFA and its leftist allies , armed with seemingly improvised explosive devices, are waging a campaign not only of dissent, but of terror against American symbols and thoroughfares. According to these views, Wick isn’t a lone actor but one of many activists operating under a loosely knit extrem...

Pete Hegseth discusses U.S. attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities When Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi declared that the U.S. had “blown up diplomacy” following coordinated strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, his outrage was predictable—but to many who observe global power moves beyond the headlines, his words may have contained a disturbing truth: perhaps diplomacy was never the goal to begin with. By striking the Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear sites without a UN mandate, congressional authorization, or even a global security consensus, the U.S.—under President Trump—has drawn a clear line in the sand. But the question asked by independent analysts and alternative geopolitical thinkers is: Was this attack not just military, but ritualistic? Was it engineered to provoke a wider response and finally close the door on peaceful resolution? Iran’s furious appeal to the UN Charter’s Article 51 —the right of self-defense—is being met with carefully staged silence in many We...

 Israel in scripture is not a state. It's a people; the born-again believers in Jesus Christ. The Brutal Truth June 2025 The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

The Brutal Truth June 2025 The Brutal Truth Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research.

 What Happened June 21–22, 2025 : President Trump confirmed U.S. forces jointly attacked Iran’s Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan nuclear enrichment sites, using B‑2 stealth bombers carrying bunker-buster bombs and Tomahawk missiles from submarines news.com.au +13 theguardian.com +13 thetimes.co.uk +13 . Trump declared the sites “completely obliterated” as part of a broader mission to deny Iran a nuclear-capable platform thetimes.co.uk +2 businessinsider.com +2 nypost.com +2 . 🧭 Reactions & Major Fallout International UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned the attack risks escalating into a full-scale conflict en.wikipedia.org +13 theguardian.com +13 thetimes.co.uk +13 . Iran’s government condemned it as a blatant violation of international law and warned of potential legal action theguardian.com +1 en.wikipedia.org +1 . Domestic U.S. Republicans praised the strike as decisive leadership to preempt Iran’s nuclear ambitions abc7ny.com +3 en.wikipedia.org ...

Here's a clearer breakdown of the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) advisory opinion and what it actually says — and, just as important, what it doesn’t say: ⚖️ What the ICJ Declared July 19, 2024 the ICJ issued a binding advisory opinion finding that Israel’s occupation of the territories it captured in 1967—including the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza—is illegal under international law , due to violations such as settlement expansion, land annexation, and denial of Palestinian self-determination en.wikipedia.org +10 en.wikipedia.org +10 waronwant.org +10 . The court concluded that Israel is under an obligation to end the occupation “as rapidly as possible,” remove settlements, and make reparations to Palestinians affected aljazeera.com +2 icj-cij.org +2 en.wikipedia.org +2 . It affirmed that all states must refrain from recognizing the occupation as lawful, and must not assist in sustaining it , adding political weight to the ruling reuters.com +15 icj-cij...